🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that are already in place in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials asks for proposals to prohibit tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a pending law that include lowering the recommended coverage of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was understood to have been copied to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about industry interference with public health regulations. In recent weeks, global health authorities raised concerns that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to undermine international regulations.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence globally. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN summit conference,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Via documentation, the corporation proposes this be decreased to less than half “following international guideline limits”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities actually suggests a warning should cover at least half of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, suggesting that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. The corporation recommends banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for multiple violations “extending from a percentage of annual turnover to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the managing director of the African subsidiary says the firm is “committed to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but claims that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We exist in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and collect the yield and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to benefit personally and all the future family lines while my neighbor's family are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual collapse.”

Tobacco control legislation in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative stated: “The corporation runs its activities following with current country statutes. Further, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which enable interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The corporation remained “not against rules”, the representative commented, mentioning that young individuals should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to achieve intended population health targets, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “reflect the realities of the African nation's economy and tobacco industry, which involves increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.